Alice Law and Relativity Theory

Part 1

What Is Alice Law? Derivation of (c+v)(c-v) mathematics for Relativity Theory

Han Erim

22 February 2011

What Is Alice Law?

Alice Law is Relativity theory itself. It is logically and mathematically different from Albert Einstein's relativity theory.

First, I would like to touch on a few basic concepts.

What Is Relativity?

Relativity is the deformations that occur in electromagnetic interaction due to the existence of the universal constant limit value c, the speed of light.


Relativity occurs mutually between reference frames. For relativity to occur, there must be a velocity difference between the reference frames. The intensity of the effect is proportional to the velocity difference.

With Alice Law, there is no longer a need for a division such as General Relativity and Special Relativity for Relativity theory. However, I provide the necessary definitions for clarity.

What Is Special Relativity?

Special relativity examines electromagnetic interactions between reference frames moving without the influence of a force. For example, the relativity effects observed between two reference frames in uniform linear motion relative to each other fall within the scope of Special Relativity.

What Is General Relativity?

If Special Relativity is considered together with force effects, it is called General Relativity. For instance, electromagnetic waves reaching us from a star are emitted under the influence of gravitational force; therefore, the effect of gravity must be taken into account when interpreting the interaction.

Relativity theory is nothing more than a generalization made by adding force effects after Special Relativity theory is obtained.

In my older works, I may have expressed the definitions above in a different way. For example, in the past I thought the scope of General Relativity was broader. Please regard this as normal. Alice Law has developed over time, and many concepts have settled into place over time. What I wrote above expresses my current thoughts at the point I have reached today.

Derivation of (c+v)(c-v) mathematics for Relativity Theory.

Alice Law is built upon a fundamental physical fact we all know. This physical fact is:

REFERENCE POINT: Let us imagine a box with a light source at its center. When the lamp is turned on, the light reaches the front and back of the box simultaneously. Whether the box is moving or not does not change this situation. Let us assume there is an observer inside the box. Whatever the speed of the box may be, when the observer measures the speed of the light going to the walls of the box, they always obtain the value c (the constant speed of light). (Figure 1

)

The paragraph above is a conclusion that our current physics knowledge tells us and points to. I call this paragraph the REFERENCE POINT in order to use it in later sections.

Alice Law is based on the assumption that the event described in the paragraph above is true.

Therefore, if we need to speak of a theoretical foundation on which Alice Law rests, it is only the content of the paragraph above. A sequence of proofs based on this theoretical foundation shapes Alice Law. For this reason, do not evaluate Alice Law within the scope of a theory. Alice Law is definitely not a theory.

I want to draw your attention to two points in the REFERENCE POINT. While mentioning the motion of the box, note that no force acting on the box is mentioned. This is what I mean when I say there is no concept of force within the logic of Special Relativity theory. Second, while describing the situation, it is emphasized that the lamp is at the midpoint of the box. There is the equality OA=OB. Let us note the existence of this equality.

Now let us divide the box longitudinally into two equal parts, and also imagine that we cut the lamp and its wires that stand in the middle. Let us move the box parts toward each other as shown in the figure below. Let a flash of light occur when the cut wires of the lamp touch each other. In this case as well, the light will reach the front and back walls of both box parts simultaneously. At this stage, we see that an interesting situation arises. Because when the moment the light reaches the edges is considered, the box parts are at different coordinates relative to our reference frame (in the figure this is represented by an eye). Clearly, in the face of this situation, we cannot claim that the light travels at speed c relative to our reference frame. Let us assume there is an observer inside each box part. Starting from the REFERENCE POINT, we know that in the boxes they are in, the observers will find the speed of the light going to the edges to be c. From this, the following result is obtained: if the speed of the box parts relative to our reference frame is v, then the speed of the lights traveling toward the walls of the boxes should be, relative to us, c+v and c-v depending on the direction of motion of the box. (Animation Figure 1)

We see that light has an interesting behavior that current physics has not yet defined, and this behavior has defined a different mathematics for the behavior of light.

flash

In the example above, the light source was inside the boxes. Now let us take the light source outside and carry out a similar event. Let us use two identical boxes. Let there be an observer in each, and let the observers stand at the midpoint of the box they are in. We place the light sources and the boxes on the ground to both sides as seen in the figure below. In order for our reasoning to be sound, let us make use of the principle of symmetry. Let our reference frame (the eye) be on the axis of symmetry. Let us accept that events occurring to the right and left of the axis of symmetry always occur simultaneously and equally for us. Let us move the boxes toward the central symmetry axis from both sides toward each other. (Animation Figure 2)

At this stage, asking the following question reveals Special Relativity theory with all its details: at what moment should the lights turn on so that the observers in the boxes see that both lights turned on at the same time?

flash

Let us note that the REFERENCE POINT shows us that in order for observers to be able to see that the lights turned on simultaneously, first the lights must reach both edges of the boxes simultaneously. That is, in order to reach the solution, there is another question that must be answered: "Where do the lights reach the edges of the boxes?". To answer both questions consistently, resorting to classical mechanics or using Albert Einstein's mathematics does not provide a solution. The solution path is not within today's physics knowledge.

There is only one answer to the question, and the REFERENCE POINT gives the answer again. The lights must be turned on at the moment when the equality AO=OB is satisfied for the observers. That is, at the moment the lamps turn on, the observers must be at equal distances from the lamps. There is only one coordinate point that satisfies this condition: the lights must turn on when the observers reach the axis of symmetry. This answer also gives the answer to the question "Where do the lights reach the edges of the boxes?" When the lights are turned on in this way, the observers see that the lights turned on simultaneously. At the moment of seeing, one observer is to the right of the axis of symmetry and the other is to the left of the axis of symmetry. We already know that when the observers measure the speed of the light reaching their own reference frames, they will find c. If we call the speed of the boxes v, we can perform the necessary calculations. From this, it is seen that the mathematics that provides the solution is again the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics. Note again that the solution is independent of the length of the boxes and the speeds of the boxes. The fact that there is only one solution path constitutes a proof.

This proof is the proof of existence of the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics for the behavior of light. This mathematics is also the new mathematics of relativity theory.

The requirement that the observers be on the axis of symmetry at the moment the lights turn on is, according to Einstein physics, not something that can already be possible. I do not like saying this, but I need to say it again here. The proof here abolishes Albert Einstein's Special Relativity theory together with all its results.

On aliceinphysics.com you can find many publications that examine this proof in depth.

The works above are publications related to this proof. You can also find publications on this subject in Alice Law Version 3 and Alice Law Version 4.

After deriving the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics for the behavior of light, what needs to be done is to examine what consequences this mathematics leads to. Relativity, in short, is nothing other than the consequences of this mathematics. In the subsequent publications of this series, I will address the results of Alice Law in order. Of course, you do not have to wait for these new publications. On my website you can find many publications about Alice Law and the results of the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics. But also keep following here. The topics I will explain in this series will be more organized and will present a greater unity.

link