Alice Law shows that the thesis stating that light propagates in vacuum with speed c is wrong, and instead demonstrates that it moves with speed c with respect to the body which is its arrival target. Since I have explained in detail how this situation occurs in all versions of Alice Law, I will not repeat it here and will only present the animations and proof needed for the Alice Law Version 6 book.
Animation 1 – This is the animation of the proof made in the Alice Law Version 6 Book. The lights turn on and reach the walls of both parts. The speed of the lights going toward the walls of the parts is, with respect to the ground reference frame, necessarily (c+v) (c−v). The situation I show here is the simplest form of the proof belonging to Alice Law.
Animation 2 – In the previous animation there was a single light source and it was inside the reference frames (the box parts). If we place the light sources outside, the situation does not change and light behaves in accordance with the (c+v) (c−v) mathematics. That is, light (i.e. photons, i.e. electromagnetic waves) will move with speed c with respect to the body which is the arrival target. For an observer watching the event from the ground reference frame, the speed of the lights going to the vehicles is (c+v) (c−v).
If, as shown in the animation, the lights are switched on when the midpoints of the vehicles are on the symmetry axis, the observers standing at the midpoints of the vehicles will see both lights as having turned on simultaneously.
The more comprehensive proof which explains why light behaves in this way is given below. This proof also shows, in a very interesting way, that the “sum of velocities theorem” is valid for electromagnetic waves as well.
Animation 3 – I first published this graph in my FIRST PAPER work. The graph is a Path–Time–Velocity graph of the event we watched in Animation 2. The graph starts at the moment when the lights are turned on. At this instant, the midpoints of both vehicles are on the symmetry axis.
The event for which we are seeking a solution is this: There are two vehicles moving in opposite directions with equal speeds. At what time must we switch on the lights at points A and B so that the observers in the vehicles see the lights coming toward them as having turned on simultaneously? We use the symmetry principle for the situation of the vehicles and the lights. With respect to the ground reference frame, the events occurring in both vehicles will be simultaneous and equal.
Three conditions must be satisfied in order to solve the problem. These conditions are as follows:
The following additional conditions must also be satisfied in the proof:
These subsidiary conditions are automatically satisfied in the proof, because at the moment when the lights are turned on the distances between the lamps and the observers are equal. (See Follow the Rabbit)
When we think about the behavior of light using the (c+v) (c−v) mathematics, all of the conditions above are satisfied. If you move the scrollbar downward, you can see at which positions (X axis) the lights and the vehicles are at each time (Y axis).
What turns this graph into a proof of the existence of the (c+v) (c−v) mathematics in nature is that it shows exactly when the lights must be switched on. If we want the observers standing at the midpoints of the vehicles to see both lights as having turned on at the same time, then the lights must be switched on at the moment when the midpoints of both vehicles reach the symmetry axis, that is, as shown here. For the switching-on moment of the lights there is only a single option. This situation makes the existence proof of (c+v) (c−v) without any difficulty and in a very straightforward manner.
The special theory of relativity that is currently used by physicists, represented by Albert Einstein’s mathematics, is helpless in the face of the proof made here. Using Albert Einstein’s mathematics, no solution can be obtained that would invalidate this proof. Because for the choice of the switching-on moment of the lights there is only one position, and this compulsory position for the lights immediately, from the very beginning, puts an end to the mathematics proposed by Albert Einstein for the special theory of relativity. There is nothing to do but surrender.
The sections “Relativity of Simultaneity” and “Relative Velocity of Light” in Alice Law Version 5 examine and explain this proof in great detail. You can also read my later work “Follow the Rabbit” on this subject. All of my works can be read online on my web site.
In Alice Law the special theory of relativity has been completely rewritten from the ground up. In fact, I must say that I no longer feel like calling it a theory, because it did not come only with a theory, but together with a physical proof.
You will find the consequences of the (c+v) (c−v) mathematics, which shapes the special theory of relativity, in my other works. Everything I explain to you within Alice Law is new and has never been written anywhere else before. For this reason, I have no doubt that you will follow my writings with great interest.
With my best regards,
Han Erim