Alice Law and Relativity Theory

Part 2

The close relationship between fields and (c+v)(c-v) mathematics

Han Erim

22 February 2011

In the previous section, we saw that the behavior of light is represented by the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics. The first and most important result of this mathematics is that it establishes a relationship with FIELDS.

Let us reconsider the figure in which we placed the lamps outside. There is one observer in each box; when the observers are on the axis of symmetry, the lamps turn on and, as a result, the observers see the lights turning on simultaneously. For simplicity, I have represented the lights here with yellow spheres (let us think of them as photons). (Animation – Figure 1)

Above, we see that an event occurs which we can describe as follows: Let us imagine that the observers inside the boxes are connected to rulers attached to their midpoints. If we pay attention, we see that the light behaves as if it is using the ruler belonging to the observer toward whom it is traveling. If, based on the REFERENCE POINT, we assume that the speed of the light traveling toward the observer is constant, that is c relative to the observer, then we can say that the speed of light does not change relative to the ruler on which it travels. Whether the light approaches the observer from behind or from the front, regardless of the observer’s velocity, since the ruler is attached to the observer and the speed of light is constant relative to the ruler, the result does not change and the speed of light remains constant relative to its destination. We also see that this motion of light is independent of other reference systems and depends only on the ruler belonging to its destination. (Animation Figure 2)

From the perspective of the observer on the ground (the eye), the situation can be summarized as follows: Relative to the ground observer, the speed of light becomes (c+v) or (c-v), depending on the direction and speed of the ruler, since the ruler is attached to the observer and the speed of light relative to the ruler is c.

What happens is extremely simple, yet extremely interesting and astonishing. This is the first and most important result shown to us by the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics.

THE CONCEPT OF FIELD

There is an important issue before us that we must think about and answer. Does this ruler that we use to describe the motion of light have a physical counterpart in physics? Can the current knowledge of physics tell us what this ruler actually is? This is a very important question, because if it is not answered, we are faced with an even more difficult question: how does light know the velocity of the object at its destination?

There is no need for a long search. When we look at the law of gravitation in Classical Mechanics, we find the answer we are looking for. Classical Mechanics states that every object has its own FIELD and that each object affects the surrounding space in proportion to its mass. Physics uses the concepts of FIELD and FIELD FORCES to explain the mechanisms of gravitational and electrical interactions. Although physics has not yet been able to give a clear answer to the question “What is a field?”, that is not an obstacle. According to Classical Mechanics, when an object moves, its field moves with it. What matters here is this great similarity. We saw that observers carry their own rulers with them. By making use of this similarity, we can, in principle, accept that the ruler represents the field of the object. We can say that the rulers represent the fields of the observers.

v

Such an assumption leads to two important results. First, Classical Mechanics and the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics will be related to each other without any forcing. Second, an important step will be taken regarding fields. Because when you relate the cause of the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics to fields, it becomes clear that we will obtain new information about fields. We can immediately see how revolutionary and important such an assumption can be.

Electromagnetic interaction takes place through fields.

In fact, the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics does not require an additional concept such as fields. What the ruler represents is also not of great importance. When calculation is required, we can introduce imaginary rulers like this and perform all our relativity-related calculations without error.

In Alice Law, fields are physical realities. Alice Law itself was derived starting from the law of gravitation of Classical Mechanics. I also published a study under the title Field Concept on this subject. It would be beneficial for you to take a look at it.

Thinking about relativity theory together with fields significantly facilitates the understanding of this theory. The existence of relativity is a direct consequence of the existence of fields.

In the animation above, we attached a ruler to the observers. Below, I have representatively shown the same situation using fields. Each observer has their own field, and the light uses the field of the observer toward whom it is traveling.

Now some definitions need to be made.

What Is the Speed of Light Constant (c)?

Electromagnetic waves travel within fields. The speed of an electromagnetic wave within a field is c (the speed of light constant). The value c represents the highest speed that can be achieved within a field.

Here we can see how much Alice Law changes physics. Thinking that light propagates in a vacuum and thinking that light travels within fields are very different concepts. Alice Law proceeds from the general to the specific; Alice Law contains details.

What Is a Field?

A definition is also needed for the concept of a field.

Field: The regions reached by the gravitational force of an object constitute the field of that object.

This definition is sufficient for Alice Law at present. It provides us with minimum information, while at the same time keeping us within the framework of physics.

Two fundamental principles are defined for fields in Alice Law. These principles are extremely useful when they are used to reach logical conclusions in relativity.

1) Every object has its own field.
2) Each part of an object is a separate object and therefore has its own field.

I especially ask you to pay attention to item 2. You can see the importance of this principle in the experiments of Alice Law. I will frequently return to the subject of fields in the future.

The relationship between (c+v)(c-v) mathematics and fields.

Alice Law shows that fields, like material objects, are real physical quantities. The emergence of such a result from Alice Law is its greatest surprise. At present, we cannot answer why fields are made of what they are made of, what their relationship with matter is, or what they truly are. Discovering these mysterious structures—which affect the space around matter and contain the mechanisms of gravitational force, charge forces, and electromagnetic interaction—and answering what they really are will continue to be one of the greatest research topics in physics, now and in the future.

However, in order to understand relativity theory, it is not necessary to answer such questions. Examining the results of the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics is sufficient to understand what kinds of effects relativity leads to.

The fact is that if the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics and fields are related, then the answers to many questions about fields will be obtained from Alice Law. Relating this mathematics to fields is therefore the most rational approach.

Finally, I want to show you the difference between Albert Einstein’s Special Relativity theory and Alice Law. I have deliberately included the figure above for this reason. I wanted to show you how difficult it is to conceive the existence of a mathematics like (c+v)(c-v) in nature without using the concept of fields. It is so difficult that even Albert Einstein, the father and founder of the theory of relativity, made a mistake.

Because Albert Einstein did not have a concept of fields as in Alice Law, he treated space as a whole when constructing his theory. He thought that the limitation of the speed of light should be valid throughout space. According to this theory, regardless of the reference system from which it is measured, the speed of light must give the same result for all reference systems, namely the constant c.

However, in Alice Law, space is not a whole. Within space, there are fields belonging to different objects. We can also think of fields as special spaces belonging to objects. The limitation of the speed of light is valid within these special spaces. Since the speed of light is c relative to the field in which it travels, the speed of light varies depending on the reference system from which it is measured and on the destination toward which it is traveling.

I arrived at Alice Law from the very beginning by using the concept of FIELDS. That is why I was able to see the details that Albert Einstein could not see. Alice Law is, in one word, magnificent.

My physicist friend,

You need to learn Alice Law as quickly as possible. Together with the previous section, there are a total of two sections. All the proofs necessary for you to decide about Alice Law are contained in these two sections. You will find the results of Alice Law in the following sections.

If you ask someone else about Alice Law, be careful, because the person you ask will most likely not be more knowledgeable than you about Alice Law. Moreover, if they are under the influence of Albert Einstein’s theory, their eyes will not see, their ears will not hear, and their thoughts will be confused. Their thoughts have become ill. The name of this illness is “Brain Contraction”. It is the result of thinking with Lorentz transformations for a very long time. You must think about Alice Law on your own and decide on your own.

One last thing I want to say: in order to obtain Special Relativity theory, as you see here, you must begin by using two boxes and an axis of symmetry. If you begin as Albert Einstein did, you will fall into the same trap as he did. If, one hundred years ago in 1905, physicists had had an alternative like Alice Law, none of them would have turned to Albert Einstein’s theory, and today you would be within Alice Law.

I invite you to Alice Law.

Han Erim