Alice Law and Relativity Theory
Part 6 – About Alice Law
ALICE LAW HAS CHANGED RELATIVITY THEORY
Albert Einstein began building the theory of relativity with a pre-assumption. This pre-assumption is as follows: “I accept that the speed of light in vacuum is c (the speed-of-light constant) and that the speed of light does not change with respect to all frames.” This pre-assumption is the principle on which Einstein’s relativity theory rests, and all mathematical solutions were produced according to this assumption.
However, Alice Law points to the existence of a very different reality. This reality is the existence of FIELDS. Light does not travel in empty space; it travels within fields, and electromagnetic interaction takes place through fields. The speed of light within a field is c (the speed-of-light constant).
The rule that an electromagnetic wave traveling within a field must obey the speed-of-light constant c is limited only to the field in which it is traveling. Therefore, there is no obligation that the speed of light must be c with respect to all frames. Of course, the existence of such a situation brings with it a different mathematical solution for relativity. The mathematics of Alice Law for relativity is different.
ALICE LAW AND FIELDS
Alice Law clearly shows us that electromagnetic interaction takes place through fields. In order to see what Alice Law means by “field”, what it points to, let us first take a look at the laws of gravitation and static electricity.
1) Let us consider the law of gravitation. Let A, B, C be three masses. To calculate the force that these three bodies exert on a mass P in space, we do the following: First, we calculate separately the gravitational forces (field forces) that each of the three masses exerts on mass P, and then we add the force values we obtained. Notice that in order to do the calculation, we are forced to define a separate FIELD (or field force) for each mass.
2) Let us look at Coulomb’s law of static electricity. Let A, B, C be three electric charges. To calculate the force that these three charges exert on a charge P in space, we do a completely similar calculation. We calculate separately the electric field force that each of the three charges exerts on charge P, and then we add the force values we obtain. Here as well, notice that we are forced to define a separate FIELD (or field force) for each charge.
As we can see, in both cases we had to define FIELDS belonging to masses or charges in order to perform calculations, and then we found the effects of these fields on a mass or charge such as P in space. But do we really know what the field is that we are forced to use while calculating? There is no answer to this question. We do not know what a field is. But we know this for sure: If the concept of FIELD is removed from physics, there is no such thing as “physics” left.
Without using fields, without relying on them, without benefiting from them, it is not possible to calculate, to understand physics, or to reach conclusions. And this is exactly where Alice Law tells us:
“Those fields that you are forced to define in order to calculate— electromagnetic interaction also uses those fields. Electromagnetic interaction takes place THROUGH FIELDS.”
In the depths of nature that we have not yet descended to, we knew that there must be a mechanism that allows gravitational forces and electric forces to operate. Alice Law shows that electromagnetic interaction also uses the same mechanism (or a similar mechanism); that is what we did not know.
Just as gravitational force, electric forces, and magnetic forces need fields in order to have an explanation, Alice Law shows that the same is true for electromagnetic interaction; it has added electromagnetic interaction alongside them.
ALICE LAW IS A FIELD LAW
I would like to answer the question “What is Alice Law?” in two ways:
1) Alice Law is the owner of that hidden mechanism of nature which we call FIELD, and on which fundamental interactions take place. It is a FIELD LAW, and it determines according to which rules interactions will occur.
2) As we are doing now, it is also possible to treat Alice Law as a FIELD LAW that covers only electromagnetic interaction. Alice Law is also a RELATIVITY LAW, because relativity relies entirely on electromagnetic interaction, and Alice Law regulates and determines the operating mechanism of electromagnetic interaction.
It is far too early to speak about the remaining three fundamental interactions (gravitation, weak and strong interaction). The information we will obtain from Alice Law will shed light on these three interactions as well.
flash 1
RELATIVITY IS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON THAT DEVELOPS
DEPENDING ON THE EXISTENCE OF FIELDS
By examining Animated Figure 1 above, let us see how electromagnetic interaction occurs. As seen in the figure, there is a receiver and a transmitter. The transmitter emits a signal at regular intervals. The receiver detects these signals. According to Alice Law, the process between the moment the signal is emitted and the moment it arrives occurs as follows:
- First, we will assume that the receiver must have its own field.
- The center of the receiver’s field will be at the receiver’s location.
- If the receiver moves, its field will move along with it.
- The second point to consider is that a signal going to the receiver will not travel in empty space, but inside the receiver’s field.
- Therefore, the motion of the signal is independent of the source from which it was emitted.
- Since the speed of the electromagnetic wave with respect to the field it travels in does not change and is always c (the speed-of-light constant), whether the receiver moves or not, the speeds of the signals with respect to the field do not change.
- As a result, for the receiver, the speed of the signal arriving to it is always constant, i.e., c. (The receiver defines the signal’s speed with respect to its own reference frame.)
- For the transmitter, however, the speed of the signal can change depending on the direction and speed of the receiver’s motion, because the signal travels inside the receiver’s field.
- In the transmitter’s own frame, the speed of the signal going to the receiver will be (c+v) or (c-v) depending on the receiver’s speed and direction of motion. Here, c is the speed of the signal with respect to the field; v is the receiver’s speed in the transmitter’s frame (the carrying speed of the field).
If we drag the receiver left and right with the mouse in the figure, we can easily see what kind of event takes place. When we drag the receiver, we see that the signals inside the field are affected (carried along with the field), don’t we? The reason is that the signal travels inside the field. Fields are the infrastructure through which electromagnetic interaction takes place.
Here we see the extraordinary design of nature. Nature defines a field for every body in the universe. These fields are nested in space, and nature can distinguish between these almost infinite number of fields, carry out interactions through fields, and keep an interaction within one field independent from other fields.
This is the new knowledge that Alice Law brings to us. This knowledge is a direct consequence shown by the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics. Electromagnetic interaction occurs in the way we see here.
When we drag the receiver, we see that the spacing of successive signals within the field changes. As a result, the effects we call “relativity” emerge; among them, I explained time dilation and length contraction in the previous two chapters. Other effects such as simultaneity and Doppler also exist in the publications on aliceinphysics.com.
Without thinking together with fields, it is almost impossible to understand relativity. Fields are the infrastructure of electromagnetic interaction.
GENERAL RELATIVITY AND SPECIAL RELATIVITY HAVE BEEN UNIFIED IN ALICE LAW
In Alice Law, there is no place for two separate concepts called “General Relativity” and “Special Relativity”. Until just a year ago, I also made this distinction. However, Alice Law gives such definite commands that you can never resist them.
With Alice Law, the mathematics of relativity had changed, and the theory of General Relativity was also greatly affected by this change. Relativity was a physical phenomenon developing depending on the field mechanism, and General Relativity had to enter into this mechanism.
Adding the force effect to the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics of Alice Law pushes General Relativity into Alice Law by making the necessary arrangements. In Alice Law, everything is gathered within a single concept of relativity. General Relativity has dissolved within Alice Law; and Special Relativity has also had to abandon the name “special”. From now on, in Alice Law there is only relativity.
The path that begins with Albert Einstein’s “principle of equivalence” and is called General Relativity will change its name, be purified from its errors, and continue. For information on this subject, I kindly ask you to read the preface of the “Energy Principles” series.
THE IMPORTANCE OF ALICE LAW
Alice Law changed the theory of relativity, which has dominated physics for about a hundred years, and said: “No, it is not like that; it is like this.” This is, of course, very important. Alice Law has changed many things in physics and I think it will continue to change them.
Alice Law has explained what time dilation, length deformation, and simultaneity truly are, revealed that the speed of light is relative, and brought a great deal of information and results along with it. While making its explanations, it also showed the formation mechanisms with complete clarity. These are, of course, very valuable pieces of information.
But there is something even more valuable than all of these: Alice Law enables a major breakthrough regarding fields. We know almost nothing about the fields that we inevitably use while expressing the most fundamental laws of physics.
Alice Law has shown that all phenomena within the scope of relativity, and moreover the entirety of electromagnetic interaction, are wholly related to fields. This also means: From now on, in order to understand fields, we must conceive and perform very special experiments that will reveal their secrets. If there is to be progress in physics, it can only be achieved by stepping into the world of fields.
THE (c+v)(c-v) MATHEMATICS OF ALICE LAW
Electromagnetic theory is, for today, the best-known (!) and, to some, a completed (!) theory in physics. However, Alice Law immediately shows us that this is not the case. Electromagnetic theory, in its current form, represents the case v = 0 in the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics. When frames moving relative to each other are taken into account (for the case v > 0), this theory is vastly incomplete.
Electromagnetic theory and relativity theory are not actually different things. A speed difference between frames causes deformations in electromagnetic interaction, and this leads to observed deviations in measurements from normal values. These deviations are called “relativity” (even though the cause has been understood incorrectly). It is correct to think of relativity as the amount of deformation observed and measured in electromagnetic interaction.
By means of the knowledge brought by Alice Law, all the clarifications I wrote here became possible. Alice Law, which is deeper than electromagnetic theory and is a FIELD LAW, is the law that prepares the infrastructure of electromagnetic interaction and regulates its general rules. Electromagnetic interaction depends on fields and occurs through fields. The (c+v)(c-v) mathematics already emerges depending on the existence of fields.
There are a few important reasons why the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics has not been noticed until now.
First is the extraordinary speed of light. Experiments that verify (c+v)(c-v) mathematics are difficult experiments. Measuring the difference between c and c+v or c-v is truly difficult; c is very large, while v is extremely small.
In order for the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics to be seen clearly, the speed of light traveling from a stationary frame toward a moving frame must be measured, and the measurement must be made not from the moving frame where the signal arrives, but from the stationary frame that emits the signal. This makes things difficult.
Second, results of the kind that verify (c+v)(c-v) mathematics (for example, the time dilation results widely obtained in GPS) have always been interpreted within Albert Einstein’s relativity theory; up to now, this was the only consistent theory we had. (It is a known fact that Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity produces deviation in GPS.) Because detecting time dilation was automatically interpreted as the correctness of that theory, deeper investigations were not pursued. However, time dilation is also a natural result in Alice Law.
There is a third point as well: The topic of “Ghost and Spring” occupies a very important place in relativity. This knowledge is new, entirely belonging to Alice Law, and has no place in Einstein physics. A physicist must know that what is measured in electromagnetic interaction is not the Spring but the Ghost. If you do not know this, you cannot reach Alice Law experimentally from data.
In short, without knowing and learning Alice Law, it is very difficult to notice the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics experimentally. Even if you obtain the result, you cannot interpret it. Physicists must first learn Alice Law—and learn it very well. Only then will they be able to interpret their experimental data. And if they measure and interpret correctly, they will find Alice Law in front of them; because the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics of Alice Law came not with theory but with proof.
ALICE LAW HAS EVOLVED OVER TIME
There are quite a lot of publications about Alice Law on aliceinphysics.com. Especially when you go back to older dated publications, you will see that many details are missing. For example, in my first publications I said that there was no time dilation and no length contraction (Alice Law Versions 3, 4, 5); there are even proofs about this.
I was able to understand years later—after reaching the “Ghost and Spring” knowledge—that those proofs were correct but also incomplete. Now I know that those proofs show equalities in Springs. Topics such as time dilation and length contraction were resolved in Alice Law only years later.
For instance, when Alice Law Version 6 was published, the topic of “Doppler Effect” had not yet entered Alice Law. I can give other examples as well. “Special Relativity” and “General Relativity” have remained in the past works of Alice Law; here they have been unified. Over the years, Alice Law has developed itself and reached today.
Of course, there may be mistakes as well as deficiencies in my past works—why not? If I rewrote Alice Law Version 5 now, I would write it very differently. But that is exactly the purpose of this series: To handle Alice Law from beginning to end with the latest information by making everything consistent—and correcting it if necessary.
You may need many of the older works. Some, although important, will not enter this series. In general, I think they are consistent works, but there may certainly be missing parts. While reading old works, I consider it healthy that you follow this series as well.
WHERE ALICE LAW IS GOING
I see that on this path that I started alone, there are now others as well. Quietly, with curiosity, and perhaps sometimes with a little fear, they examine Alice Law. This is very natural; physics is an interesting subject and sometimes it can even be frightening. It is also true that some see Alice Law as nonsense.
But there are some who are truly doing the hard thing: They are trying to enter into another person’s thoughts and understand them. They try to understand Alice Law; they weigh it in their own reasoning. I know this requires great sacrifice, and I truly appreciate and respect these people.
If one day Alice Law becomes dominant in physics, it will be thanks to the sacrifice and devotion they have shown.
I want to say that I do not expect anyone to understand Alice Law immediately. Even for me, it took decades to understand it—how could I ask that? Moreover, I am still trying to understand it; I do not see its end, and it does not seem like it will ever end.
Alice Law was never something that could be understood by a quick glance, a single reading, without thinking about it. But everything has a breaking point. Now Alice Law comes with such strong theses—especially on relativity—that it has become so strong that resisting it or remaining indifferent is becoming increasingly impossible.
If you reach the point of understanding Alice Law, you will never want to go back again.
The series will continue. Next are topics such as simultaneity, general relativity, GPS, Doppler Effect, Erim equations, etc. Many of these already exist in the publications on aliceinphysics.com. However, I will go over them once again here. Please continue to follow the series and aliceinphysics.com.
In Versions 4 and 5 of the Alice Law programs, there is a hidden button inside the letter A on the Index page. Let it be a surprise for you.
I greet you all with respect.
Han Erim
ALICE LAW COPYRIGHT
All publications on the aliceinphysics.com website are registered with the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the Republic of Türkiye and are under copyright protection. You may want to publish your own works on Alice Law and the (c+v)(c-v) mathematics.
I am looking for a solution to reassure those who want to work on this subject regarding copyright. I think this will become clear soon. You can correspond with me about this.
---------------------------------------------------------------
In 2025, Alice Law was relicensed under the following Creative Commons License:© 2001–2025 Han Erim – Alice Law – Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
link