Third Postulate

Han Erim

May 7, 2012

THIRD POSTULATE

Sometimes a single sentence expresses a truth so clearly that there’s nothing more to say. When it comes to physics, such sentences are often used to express physical laws. If the sentence carries an even stronger meaning, it becomes a physical postulate. Postulates are high-level principles that define the rules physical laws must follow.

Alice Law also has its own unique physical postulate. I wrote this postulate years ago while working on Alice Mathematics. I will introduce it to you here.

I believe that in the future, this postulate will become the third postulate of physics. The first two were written by Albert Einstein. This is the third.

Albert Einstein’s two physical postulates:
Principle of Relativity: The same electrodynamic and optical laws apply to all reference systems, encompassing the equations of mechanical physics.
Constancy of the Speed of Light: Light propagates in a vacuum with speed c, independent of the motion of the source.

After discovering the (c+v)(c−v) mathematics, I tried to adapt it to the Theory of Relativity. When one embarks on such a task, they inevitably seek theoretical foundations to reference. The Principle of Relativity introduced logic and a chain of rules into the subject; it was very powerful, and it was exactly what I was looking for. The Constancy of the Speed of Light Postulate seemed as if it was written for Alice Law itself. The term “empty space” in the postulate corresponds to “special space” in Alice Law, that is, the “FIELD.”

By embracing these two postulates, I had already established the theoretical foundation of (c+v)(c−v) mathematics from the very beginning. For this reason, I decided to adopt Albert Einstein’s two postulates as my reference points. Alice Law has always embraced these two postulates, and you can see this in all my publications. These two are the treasures of Alice Law.

(c+v)(c−v) Mathematics and Questions

Alice Law clearly shows that (c+v)(c−v) mathematics must be taken as a basis for both Electromagnetic Theory and the Theory of Relativity. However, this mathematics inevitably brings up some questions. The first question that arises is undoubtedly this: How can an electromagnetic wave adjust its speed as “c” relative to the object it is targeting?

For example, consider an electromagnetic wave coming toward Earth from a source hundreds of light-years away. The fact that it can always maintain its speed as c relative to Earth is truly fascinating. Earth’s motion in its orbit, or the speed and direction of the Solar System in space, do not disrupt this constancy.

Even if we assume, as discussed (or to be discussed) in the Relativity section, that every object has a field and light travels within these fields, it’s still difficult to explain how such a situation can occur. The Third Postulate of Alice Law is intended to answer this question.

There is no point in objecting to (c+v)(c−v) mathematics, because all necessary proofs have been made. Of course, anyone is free to object. What’s missing are experiments — and those will be completed in time.

Alice Law - Third Postulate The Length of a Field Never Changes

In the first section, we saw that a field of an object could be defined within a “1 length” and in terms of frequencies. There was also the following primary fundamental equation connecting field values, frequency, and mass:

d = f · m     (distance = frequency × mass)

First, I would like to show you what kind of meaning frequencies have in physics. In the diagram below, we define two perpendicular axes: the Y-axis as the ENERGY AXIS and the X-axis as the DIMENSION AXIS. On the Y-axis, we place the “1 length” and frequencies. At the origin of the graph, we place any mass value. Using the equation d = f·m, we can define a coordinate value on the Dimension Axis for each frequency value within the “1 length.”

The important point is that all equations related to field laws (such as gravity, electric charge, motion laws) can be expressed using either of these two axes. Classical Mechanics uses the Dimension Axis. Alice Law, on the other hand, is based on the Energy Axis. As an example, let’s write Newton’s Law of Gravitation for both axes.

Dimension Axis and Energy Axis

The Dimension Axis is the one we live in, our own reality. It is of primary importance to us because we observe its outcomes and think within its framework. But I don’t believe that the Dimension Axis holds primary importance for physics or for nature itself. For physics, the Dimension Axis is a reflection or result of the Energy Axis. The true domain where physical laws occur is the Energy Axis.

I say these things with confidence, because nature does not have its own ruler, clock, or scale. It doesn’t weigh masses with a scale, measure distances with a meter, or define laws of motion using a stopwatch. Concepts like meter, clock, and mass are tools we invented to understand the rules of the universe. We need these concepts; nature does not. Equations based on the Energy Axis are closer to the rules of nature.

A change on the Energy Axis results in a change on the Dimension Axis. If you go from frequency A to frequency B on the Energy Axis, you move from point A to point B on the Dimension Axis. This is how thinking works in Alice Law.

Of course, if you go from point A to point B on the Dimension Axis, you also move from frequency A to frequency B. But that way of thinking is not the foundational mode of thought in Alice Law.

THIRD POSTULATE

In Right-Hand Mathematics, there is no actual physical length that corresponds to the “1 Length.” The length we assign to it is symbolic and is used to visualize the frequencies it contains. We already saw this in the animations—using the slider, we could stretch or compress the “1 Length” as we wished.

Now, I want you to think of the “1 Length” shown on the page as representing the field of the universe. You, your partner, your children, your home, Earth, the Sun, the stars, galaxies—everything you can imagine—exists somewhere within that “1 Length.”

When you press the Start button and begin the animation, you will see the “1 Length” shrink down to the zero point. As you watch it contract, keep in mind that everything in the universe is still within that “1 Length.” Once the length completely disappears, a tiny point remains. That tiny point is the “1 Length” itself. The entire universe, with all its contents, has been compressed into that tiny point.

This visualization has the following meaning: What we call dimension is a projection of energy. Dimension arises as a result of the existence of energy. But energy itself does not require dimension. Energy is dimensionless.

Third Postulate:

If the vast universe can fit inside a tiny point along with all its content, then I can now define the third postulate of Alice Law. Since a point has no dimension: The length of a field never changes.

Even though our universe appears endlessly vast, it is actually a dimensionless space. Within such a space, an electromagnetic wave coming toward Earth from hundreds of light-years away can indeed maintain its speed as c relative to Earth.

ABOUT THE THIRD POSTULATE

I have shared with you what I observed within Right-Hand Mathematics. I’ve spoken about the “1 Length” and its significance for physics. Of course, all of this reflects my personal thoughts. They don’t necessarily have to be correct.

I believe that “1 Length” and frequencies will become highly important for physics in the future. And I think that, one day, this postulate of Alice Law will become the third postulate of physics.

Alice Law - Third Postulate The Length of a Field Never Changes